DoubleZero (2Z) lately made headlines after receiving a No-Motion Letter from the SEC, marking a big regulatory milestone for the blockchain infrastructure undertaking.
Nevertheless, as a substitute of strengthening market confidence, the controversial token allocation mechanism sparked skepticism throughout the neighborhood. It additionally despatched the token’s value to the bottom proper after itemizing.
Sponsored
Sponsored
In late September 2025, a serious improvement occurred for DoubleZero (2Z). The SEC issued a No-Motion Letter regarding 2Z’s token distribution mechanism. This uncommon transfer was seen by many within the business as an encouraging signal of collaboration between infrastructure initiatives and regulators.
“At this time’s no-action letter exemplifies how performing that position may also help infrastructure suppliers spend their time deep within the weeds of constructing out infrastructure, not knee-deep in parsing the nuances of securities legal guidelines,” the assertion famous.
On the product aspect, DoubleZero has additionally been extremely regarded by business consultants. It goals to sort out bandwidth and latency points in distributed methods by offering devoted fiber-optic connections, tokenizing rewards for bandwidth suppliers, and performing as a foundational layer to “speed up” high-performance blockchains.
If profitable, the undertaking might rework how knowledge is transmitted throughout nodes and validators, probably changing into “greater than simply blockchains.”
“DoubleZero is among the most formidable initiatives we’ve ever invested in. Their know-how will make all excessive efficiency blockchains quicker and extra performant. That is the innovation we want if we wish on-chain value discovery for all the world’s property,” shared the Co-founder of Multicoin Capital.
But, regardless of these constructive alerts, DoubleZero’s 2Z token noticed a pointy decline after an preliminary surge post-listing. On the time of protection, 2Z was buying and selling at $0.53501, down 40% from its latest ATH.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Many Issues with Tokenomics
The primary subject lies not within the know-how however in tokenomics and unlock mechanisms. A sudden inflow of provide into the market and huge token transfers by main stakeholders exerted downward stress on the worth.
Tokenomics reveals a complete preliminary provide of 10 billion tokens distributed throughout teams (Basis & Ecosystem ~29%, Leap Crypto ~28%, Malbec Labs ~14%, Workforce ~10%, and others), with various vesting schedules. Many critics argue that the undertaking solely allotted tokens to VCs with none significant distribution to the neighborhood.
“A variety of questionable issues within the DoubleZero tokenomics… Solely the insiders had been allotted tokens!” emphasised one X person.
Arkham knowledge additionally confirmed that Leap Crypto acquired $42.8 million price of 2Z tokens, of which $20.9 million had been deposited to Binance and Bybit. This means potential sell-offs by market makers, contributing to the decline in value.
Not solely is there a suspicion of dumping from MM, however one other factor price noting is that some components had been in “unlocked” standing at launch. Information recorded that the full circulating provide of 2Z tokens at launch was about 3.47 billion.
This quantity is far bigger than the announcement within the undertaking’s MiCA whitepaper of seven% or 700 million 2Z. The origin of those tokens continues to be unclear, creating an info hole and rising adverse sentiment on-line.
Whereas the No-Motion Letter represents a regulatory win for DoubleZero’s infrastructure mannequin, dangers stemming from concentrated provide and unclear vesting schedules stay the important thing components behind the token’s value volatility and shaken neighborhood belief.
