Sir Tim Berners-Lee, pc scientist, inventor of the net and an all-round good man, wrote some phrases in The Night Normal earlier this week, arguing that polarization, conspiracy and psychological well being crises on-line stem from design flaws that have to be corrected — even when that requires regulation.
The piece attracts immediately from chapter 13, “Design Points,” of his just lately launched guide “This Is for Everybody: The Unfinished Story of the World Broad Internet,” which I encourage everybody to learn.
I agree with Berners-Lee’s analysis. However regulation will not be the remedy. The net’s decline will not be merely a design failure; it’s also an financial one. Design decisions comply with incentives, and people incentives have been distorted by fiat cash and the promoting mannequin it props up. Low cost credit score from the fiat-fuelled enterprise capital system pushed Silicon Valley away from hacker-led engineering and towards surveillance-driven revenue extraction.
To repair the net, we’d like open supply protocols and open supply cash.
The web could be fastened with out regulation. However we can not engineer an answer whereas ignoring the financial headwinds that form design. The financial system — quarterly shareholder primacy and fiat inflation — pressures corporations to prioritize engagement, outrage and surveillance promoting. Bitcoin adjustments this equation. It removes inflationary stress, doubtlessly breaks the advert mannequin by enabling new types of monetization that align with person pursuits fairly than exploit them. Mixed with open protocols, Bitcoin is the enabler of a freer, extra moral internet.
What Went Fallacious With World Broad Internet
Berners-Lee highlights two essential signs: polarization and psychological well being injury. He’s proper.
1. Polarization and Collapse of Shared Actuality
Berners-Lee says:
“Essentially the most egregious symptom is polarisation. Social media, as at the moment constructed, leads customers to take excessive political positions and demonise the opposing facet. This makes constructive engagement troublesome, permits outlandish conspiracy theories to flourish, and promotes demagoguery over deliberation.”
Polarization is actual. However amplification cuts each methods. The identical algorithms that floor conspiracy theories additionally amplify truths that the mainstream media suppresses. In an age of censorship and propaganda, this amplification has typically been the one manner reality surfaces.
The deeper subject is that individuals not share the identical actuality. A breaking story fractures into irreconcilable narratives relying on whether or not it spreads through Twitter, TikTok, Bluesky or Reddit; whether or not filtered by way of left-leaning fact-checkers or right-leaning commentators; whether or not summarized by Grok or ChatGPT. Every tribe outsources “reality formation” to its personal authorities, who’re incentivized to ship emotionally handy information. LLMs may also generate artificial personalities to disrupt discourse at scale. Regulation won’t restore belief right here — as a result of the issue isn’t just what flows, however how belief is established within the first place.
That mentioned, algorithms are optimized for outrage as a result of outrage is worthwhile. Regulation won’t change this, because it’s as a lot an financial drawback as it’s a technical one.
As Neal Howe and William Strauss describe in “The Fourth Turning,” we’re in a disaster period: Consensus frays, energy realigns and previous preparations give manner. In follow, meaning extra friction on-line — tribal feeds, narrative knife fights and rising coordination prices. In different phrases, we must always count on to see a few of the carnage we’re seeing at the moment, and we are able to do one thing about it.
2. Psychological Well being and Addictive Algorithms
Berners-Lee says:
“Many social media customers report struggling psychological well being points after extended utilization. {The catalogue} of ills associated to social media is alarming: nervousness, despair, jealousy, inadequacy, emotions of isolation, physique picture points.”
I agree, social media is liberating and damaging in equal measure. Search queries for nervousness rise in parallel with utilization, and {the catalogue} of harms is lengthy: despair, inadequacy, physique picture points, isolation. That is actually one thing that wants fixing.
Berners-Lee says:
“Social media corporations are utilizing machine-learning strategies to make customers hooked on their platforms. These methods are designed to be addictive, feeding folks increasingly more excessive content material, making them alternately offended and unhappy.”
This isn’t unintentional. Twenty-plus years in the past, Silicon Valley execs and engineers had been taught how one can design addictive methods at BJ Fogg’s Persuasive Know-how Lab at Stanford (his guide, for anybody , known as “Persuasive Know-how”), with some even attending retreats at his house the place these concepts had been explored additional. The *Like* button, infinite scroll and crimson notification badges all got here from his teachings and had been engineered to hijack dopamine pathways.
Jack Dorsey, talking on the Oslo Freedom Discussion board in 2024, spoke concerning the injury attributable to the algorithms designed by these corporations:
“The actual debate ought to be about free will. We’re being programmed based mostly on what we are saying we’re thinking about, and we’re advised by way of these discovery mechanisms what’s fascinating — and as we interact and work together with this content material, the algorithm continues to construct increasingly more of this bias.”
Dorsey has beforehand spoken about how Twitter started as a protocol imaginative and prescient earlier than enterprise capital steered it towards progress, management and advert monetization. Having seen the corruption of that imaginative and prescient, it’s no coincidence that Dorsey now backs open supply protocols like Nostr, Bitchat and beforehand Bluesky. His investments are a affirmation that platforms can’t be reformed from inside. Solely protocols, open by design, can defend free will from algorithmic seize.
Berners-Lee has urged that algorithms may very well be rebuilt to maximise pleasure fairly than outrage. It’s a noble imaginative and prescient, one I want had been sensible — however underneath present incentives, it’s not. Analysis exhibits that high-arousal feelings, particularly anger, unfold quicker than calm or constructive feelings.
Makes an attempt to pivot have confirmed pricey earlier than. As an example, when Fb adjusted its Information Feed in 2018 to cut back dangerous content material, customers spent 50 million fewer hours per day on the location and publishers noticed site visitors collapse. More moderen audits verify the identical sample: Platforms that downrank divisive content material see measurable drops in engagement and income. (You could find associated research right here, right here, right here and right here.)
So long as corporations are sure by their fiduciary obligation to maximise shareholder worth, regulators can not drive them to intentionally make much less cash as long as outrage stays extra worthwhile than pleasure.
Regulation of the Web
Berners-Lee has lengthy been one of many internet’s strongest defenders. He fought for internet neutrality, encryption and decentralization. He warned of surveillance lengthy earlier than it was modern. He has stood on the facet of open participation and person empowerment.
So it comes as considerably of a shock when Berners-Lee concedes that regulation is perhaps vital. He even quotes bad-faith actor Yuval Noah Harari to help this case:
“If a social media algorithm recommends to folks a hate-filled conspiracy idea, that is the fault not of the one that produced the conspiracy idea, it’s the fault of the individuals who designed and let unfastened the algorithm.”
Whereas I begrudgingly agree with Harari on this occasion, let’s not lose sight of who we’re coping with. He’s a World Financial Discussion board favourite, a constant advocate of technocratic options and somebody who has described bitcoin as a forex of mistrust. His worldview defaults to centralization, surveillance and state energy. His arguments are wearing purpose however advance much less autonomy and extra management.
Berners-Lee admits: “Whereas I typically oppose the regulation of the net, on this occasion I agree.” I’m sorry, however regulation is a slippery slope that we must always do our utmost to keep away from.
It’s as a result of Berners-Lee has been such a defender of the web that his concession to regulation feels just a little defeatist. Has the relentless rise of algorithmic seize, misinformation and addictive design worn him down? Maybe. However regulation will not be the reply.
One other phrase on regulation… When governments regulate, they entrench incumbents and weaponize “security” to justify censorship. They’re additionally hopelessly incompetent — the EU’s cookie legislation is an ideal instance: It protected no person, achieved nothing and left customers coping with annoying pop-ups.
True democracy on-line ought to be crowdsourced and constructed with open protocols — guidelines with out rulers.
The Financial Headwind of a Free and Flourishing Web
Now let’s get to the crux of the matter. The most important subject is fiat cash. Its full implementation in 1971 marked a fork within the street: productiveness stored climbing, however wages stagnated in actual phrases. WTF Occurred in 1971? exhibits the divergence clearly — inequality, debt, housing prices and social decay all accelerating after Nixon severed the ultimate tie to gold.
Earlier than 1971, costs and wages remained comparatively secure. For hundreds of years, underneath onerous cash, there was equilibrium. In the course of the short-lived classical gold normal, the Belle Époque delivered a golden age of invention and relative prosperity. Costs stayed secure, and by most accounts, life flourished. That stability vanished as soon as fiat cash turned the norm.
Since then, and at an accelerating tempo, folks have needed to work tougher for much less. Corporations have been pressured to extract extra productiveness whereas turning into much less moral. Keep in mind Google’s “Don’t be evil” motto? That is doubtless the malevolent drive that prompted Sergey, Larry and Eric to lose their innocence.
Talking of Google, its advert mannequin killed conventional media’s enterprise mannequin, leaving it depending on state subsidies and company sponsorships. Governments now use media as PR machines, which is a big a part of the polarization drawback we’re witnessing on-line.
The enterprise capital mannequin, fuelled by low-cost fiat credit score, warped Silicon Valley incentives from hacker-led engineering to surveillance-led revenue extraction. Centralization and monopolization are hallmarks of straightforward credit score and the Cantillon impact.
Jeff Sales space estimates expertise applies a pure deflationary drive of ~5% per yr, whereas Saifedean Ammous argues that actual inflation — not CPI, however financial growth — runs nearer to 15-16%. Governments offset deflation with cash printing; corporations reply by extracting extra from customers in an ever-increasing race to the underside.
The end result is seen in fairness markets: the Mediocre 493 corporations listed on the S&P 500 are structurally failing, and the S&P, powered by the Magnificent 7, principally mirrors the cash provide.
And layered on high of fiat, fiduciary obligation and quarterly reporting locked corporations right into a head-on battle with inflation. Fiduciary obligation, codified in Nineteenth-century U.S. legislation, merely required administrators to behave in shareholders’ greatest pursuits. However the SEC’s 1970 mandate for quarterly 10-Q reporting — mixed with Milton Friedman’s 1970 essay within the New York Instances proclaiming that the only real duty of enterprise is to extend income — hardened the tradition of “quarterly capitalism.”
| Yr | Occasion | Influence on Company Governance / Incentives |
| Nineteenth century | Fiduciary duties codified in U.S. company legislation. | CEOs and administrators should act in the very best pursuits of shareholders. |
| 1934 | U.S. Securities Trade Act | Gave SEC authority to require periodic reporting from public corporations. |
| 1970 | SEC mandates quarterly 10-Q reporting | Begins the tradition of Wall Avenue earnings seasons, with common short-term efficiency checks. |
| 1970 | Milton Friedman publishes “The Social Accountability of Enterprise is to Enhance Its Earnings” (NYT). | Popularizes shareholder primacy as company function. |
| 1971 | Nixon suspends gold convertibility — fiat period begins. | Rising inflation means corporations should beat not simply progress expectations, however inflationary stress too. |
| Eighties | Wall Avenue’s leveraged buyouts + stock-based CEO pay. | Locks in short-term earnings focus: Lacking 1 / 4 turns into harmful for CEOs. |
| 2000s–current | “Quarterly capitalism” dominates. | CEOs are pressured by markets, and shareholders to hit quarterly EPS targets. |
This convergence — fiat cash, shareholder primacy, quarterly reporting and venture-funded adtech — created the proper storm. Corporations are structurally incentivized to gas outrage, dependancy, and mine person information. Regulation can not change this as long as the underlying cash system is damaged. Till we alter course and return to sound cash, design fixes will at all times fail underneath financial stress.
Tim Berners-Lee, Bitcoin is the Panacea!
Bitcoin is each a remedy for damaged cash and a basis for brand spanking new enterprise fashions on-line. It isn’t an app or an organization — it’s a financial base layer that resets incentives on the root.
I don’t know the place Berners-Lee stands on Bitcoin particularly. Publicly, he’s dismissed crypto as a speculative on line casino. On that, I agree. Bitcoin is completely different: no insiders, no enterprise fund, no basis, no mutable guidelines. If he sees that distinction, good; if not but, possibly quickly.
Fixing cash
Bitcoin combines the very best properties of gold — sturdiness, shortage, uniformity, unforgeable costliness — with the very best properties of fiat — divisibility, portability. The result’s unequivocally the very best cash ever designed: It’s additionally borderless, censorship-resistant, decentralized, brazenly programmable, sure by thermodynamics and internet-native.
In distinction to Bitcoin, it’s turning into clearer with every passing yr that the fiat system is crumbling beneath our toes, as bitcoin monetizes in its shadow. Bitcoin presents a approach to diffuse the worldwide debt bubble fairly than let it implode, correcting the course of financial historical past by inserting international a reimbursement on a sound footing.
The implications are monumental, if/when bitcoin turns into fiat’s successor. For the primary time in dwelling reminiscence, society would not should swim towards the tide simply to remain nonetheless. With sound cash, the pure deflationary advantages of technological progress can accrue to all, not be siphoned away by these closest to the spigot.
Jeff Sales space, in “The Value of Tomorrow,” makes the purpose that expertise is inherently deflationary, i.e., it delivers extra for much less. However underneath fiat cash, this deflation is papered over with inflation, debt and progress targets. Bitcoin harmonizes cash with expertise. Its fastened provide means the beneficial properties of technological deflation accrue to everybody, fairly than being siphoned away.
Fixing incentives on-line
“For those who contemplate the web to be the equal to a nation state, it should have a forex native to itself, and there’s not going to be anyone social gathering or establishment that makes this occur, and there’s not going to be anyone social gathering or establishment that may cease it from taking place.” – (Jack Dorsey, Quartz)
Now that now we have an web native forex, the query is… what can it allow?
Nicely, to begin with, bitcoin can reshape incentives on-line. It could possibly do that by enabling micropayments, streaming sats and peer-to-peer monetization, which means customers can help creators immediately. Platforms can earn cash with out promoting their customers’ information to advertisers. This might reduce the impact and even put off an ad-driven, information mining mannequin that forces platforms to optimize for outrage.
It is going to additionally upend the enterprise capital mannequin, as presently those that are closest to the cash spigot profit in higher proportion. As Bitcoin has no central financial institution to create more cash, everybody has a comparatively equal footing, and thus funding ought to turn into extra decentralized, as soon as once more.
From there, totally new dynamics can emerge. Protocols and purposes received’t be beholden to growth-at-all-costs fashions dictated by enterprise funds; they’ll scale organically, funded by the very customers who depend on them. Worth turns into the metric, not quarterly progress or advert impressions. Builders can ship merchandise that resolve actual issues, and be rewarded immediately in sats. Communities can pool capital with out intermediaries, seeding tasks from the underside up fairly than ready for approval from the highest down.
On this surroundings, the web can lastly align with its unique ethos — open, interoperable and user-driven — as a result of the financial layer itself is open, interoperable and user-driven. Bitcoin clears the bottom for that alignment.
Bitcoin will not be restricted to fixing the net — it’s upstream of it. With out sound cash, design fixes will at all times be bent again towards exploitation. With sound cash, platforms can undertake fashions which might be moral by default. With internet-native cash, creators could be paid immediately. Bitcoin is the fulcrum the place damaged incentives give approach to more healthy methods — on-line and off.
“The web, our biggest instrument of emancipation, has been reworked into essentially the most harmful facilitator of totalitarianism now we have ever seen.” – Julian Assange
Fixing this doesn’t require authorities regulation. It requires realigning incentives — with open protocols and Sound Cash.
Open Supply Options
Berners-Lee factors to open supply instruments like Polis, Mastodon and Fora as promising experiments in more healthy on-line discourse. Constructing on these efforts, a brand new wave of protocols combines the identical open ethos with a local web cash, aligning incentives in ways in which advertising-driven fashions by no means might.
With Bitcoin because the financial base, protocols can deal with the design layer. These methods are dwell, early and wish broader adoption and a killer software — however they already present how one can realign incentives with out regulation.
Mastodon demonstrates what’s potential with open supply federation and timelines constructed from folks you select to comply with, fairly than engagement-driven algorithms. And whereas its refusal to depend on promoting is a energy, the absence of a local funds system is a limitation.
Enter Nostr
Launched in late 2019 by Fiatjaf, Nostr (“Notes and Different Stuff Transmitted by Relays”) is an easy protocol that decouples id and content material from any single app. Keys establish customers; relays transmit signed occasions. A number of shoppers (Damus, Amethyst, Primal, Iris, Alby) learn and write to the identical social graph, delivering actual interoperability — the form of cross-client, cross-app portability Berners-Lee requires.
Customers choose relays and form their very own feeds, placing algorithmic alternative firmly of their palms. This echoes the concept Harvard professor Jonathan Zittrain proposed — and which Berners-Lee spotlights in his guide — for fine-tuned controls to steer content material away from conspiracy rabbit holes. In contrast to that platform-driven imaginative and prescient, Nostr empowers customers immediately, with its algorithmic flexibility restricted solely by the protocol’s younger age.
Whereas funds aren’t a part of the bottom design, Lightning “zaps” are actually widespread — native, prompt tipping and funds tied to posts and profiles. That pairing — open communication plus open cash — allows bottom-up coordination and speedy iteration with out gatekeepers. Deletion is advisory (shoppers/relays might honor it), so there’s sensible permanence and accountability throughout the community.
Learn extra: Nostr: censorship-resistant communication
Protocols, Infused with Bitcoin
Chaumian Mints
Cashu by Calle brings Chaumian eCash to Bitcoin — non-public, bearer-style tokens that may run alongside Nostr or standalone. It allows quick, non-public micro-flows; Calle additionally co-founded BitChat with Jack Dorsey, taking these concepts right into a user-facing chat context.
Repute Methods
Group Notes proves cross-faction context can sluggish misinformation. Add clear weighting, DIDs and Internet-of-Belief primitives and also you get a sturdy, transportable fame. Put sats as skin-in-the-game (bonds/slashing for dishonest alerts) and the mechanism strengthens with out central censors.
Spam Resistance
Spam isn’t new, and it isn’t purely on-line. Usenet has dealt with floods for many years as a decentralized, user-run community with no central regulator. Adam Again’s Hashcash confirmed the core precept: connect a small proof-of-work price and abuse drops. The identical economics apply now with bitcoin — sats-priced frictions through Lightning (or Ark Protocol) make bot farms and propaganda costly whereas maintaining trustworthy participation low-cost.
Spam is principally a numbers sport: When it’s free, it scales; add price and also you restore the sign. Suppose refundable per-post/per-DM deposits, PoW stamps or fee limits priced in sats— good-faith interplay stays sustainable whereas mass manipulation turns into uneconomic.
In Conclusion
Sir Tim Berners-Lee is correct concerning the signs. Our opinions differ concerning the remedy. Regulation can not reverse centralization engineered by states and companies; it merely entrenches governments into the issue it partly created.
The drift didn’t begin with dangerous UX. It began with damaged cash (and all the issues therein) and the tip of sound cash (1971), along with shareholder-primacy dogma, bent incentives towards short-term nominal beneficial properties and surveillance promoting. From there, outrage paid the payments, whereas integrity fell by the way in which.
The treatment is Bitcoin returning the world to sound cash, which is able to allow open protocols to higher energy the net.
Screw the regulators.
Repair the cash, repair the world.
